Home / Retirement planner / Preparing for retirement / Converting super into retirement income: What are your options? 

Converting super into retirement income: What are your options? 

With a bit of luck, during your working life you will accumulate a tidy sum in super. When the time to retire arrives, those savings will help support you through your non-working years.

While you’ve had a long time to practice saving, converting those savings into retirement income is something you may only do once and it can be daunting. SuperGuide has put together this explainer to help you understand your options.

Note that if you are a member of a defined benefit fund your options at retirement may be different.

What are my options?

For super purposes, retirement means meeting a retirement condition of release. Once you do, there are no ‘cashing restrictions’ which means you can access any amount of your super in any way you choose.

The relevant conditions of release are retirement and reaching age 65. You can get your hands on all your super: 

Retirement planning for beginners

Free eBook

Retirement planning for beginners

Our easy-to-follow guide walks you through the fundamentals, giving you the confidence to start your own retirement plans.

"*" indicates required fields

First name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • When you turn 65 – including if you’re still working or have never worked
  • When you’re at least 60 and have permanently retired from work, or
  • When you leave a job after your 60th birthday – including if you’re returning to work.

Once you meet a retirement condition of release, or if you become permanently incapacitated before retirement age, there are four options available to you for your accumulated super balance. You can:

  1. Convert your super into a pension (also called a retirement income stream)
  2. Cash a lump sum
  3. Leave super in the accumulation phase (such as in your current super account)
  4. Combine two or all three above options.

Pensions

A super pension provides you with a regular income to live on in retirement to help replace the income you previously received from work. The most common type in the Australian market is an account-based pension, but there are also lifetime and fixed-term pension options. The maximum amount you may transfer into pension accounts for retirement is currently $2 million per person – this is called the transfer balance cap.

When the goal is generating retirement income, it’s hard to go past a pension product. Investment earnings are tax free (except in the case of transition-to-retirement pensions) and a pension account can provide sustainable retirement income by continuing to invest your savings while making regular payments to you.

Account-based pensions (non-lifetime)

When you put money into an account-based pension, you choose how the balance should be invested. That balance then earns tax-free investment returns and your regular income payments are deducted from it. When you are aged 60 or more, these regular income payments are also tax free. There is a mandated minimum percentage of your balance you must draw as income each year that increases as you age, and you can withdraw lump sums whenever you wish.

Features of account-based pensions:

Flexibility

Choose the income amount that suits you and change it as needed, withdraw lump sums if required and choose how your funds should be invested. Roll over your balance to another super fund at any time. You can even transfer some or all of your pension account back into an accumulation account if you no longer want to draw income from it.

Tax-free status

Tax-free investment earnings mean your account can grow more quickly than a comparable investment outside super because tax is not eroding your returns. Your regular income withdrawals are also tax free if you are aged 60 or more, unless you are a member of an untaxed fund (these are uncommon).

Estate planning

Any balance remaining in your account after your death is passed on to your beneficiaries. You may choose for your spouse to take over ownership and continue receiving the pension (reversionary pension) or a lump sum may be paid.

Longevity risk

There is no guarantee that your balance will last for life. Investment losses or lower returns than you planned for could mean your balance is depleted earlier than you expected. The sequence of investment returns is also important.

Centrelink assessment

The balance of your account is counted in the assets test and deemed income is calculated for the income test to determine your Age Pension eligibility and/or eligibility for other Centrelink benefits. The actual level of income you withdraw is not assessed, only the deemed amount. Note that pensions opened prior to 1 January 2015 may be assessed differently.

Most super funds offer an account-based pension.

Fixed term and lifetime pensions and annuities

Fixed term and lifetime pensions are usually non-account-based. In a non-account-based pension you do not have an individual account balance, but rather purchase an income on agreed terms with a product provider (a super fund or a life company). When a non-account-based pension is provided by a life company it is called an annuity. Annuities can be purchased with super or non-super money, but pensions provided by super funds can only be purchased with money that has first been contributed to super.

If you are a member of a defined benefit super fund, the fund may be designed to pay you a lifetime pension rather than having an account balance.

Innovation in retirement products has also led to the development of the option to create a lifetime income stream while maintaining an account that holds your personal balance – an account-based lifetime pension. In this case, maximum withdrawal limits apply to ensure your balance can’t run out and insurance also may be used to top up your account.

Features of lifetime and fixed term pensions/annuities:

Longevity protection

Income will be paid for life or for the fixed term agreed. It cannot run out. You may also use a deferred annuity which doesn’t start paying income until you reach a set age – a good way for income to ‘kick in’ when you expect to have depleted your other retirement savings, including any account-based pension.

Favourable means testing

Under Centrelink’s means test rules you may receive a higher Age Pension by investing in a lifetime product. When the product you choose meets the rules for favourable treatment (known as the social security capital access schedule), only 60% of the purchase price is counted in the assets test. When you turn 84, or after you have held the product for a minimum of five years, whichever occurs last, this reduces to 30% of your purchase price. For the income test, 60% of the income you receive is counted. During a deferral period when you are not receiving income, no income is assessed by Centrelink.

The assessment we have described applies to lifetime products purchased after 1 July 2019. If you have an earlier product or you are entitled to a defined benefit pension it will be assessed differently. Check with your provider to find out the figures.

Investment risk

In a traditional product, you don’t bear the risk associated with fluctuations in investment markets. The provider pays you the agreed regular income regardless of how their underlying investments perform, and you can choose to have your income indexed to keep pace with inflation.

Modern products offer the option to instead have your income varied in line with the return of your chosen investments. This means you may be exposed to the risk your income can go down from one year to the next, but you can often receive higher income on average. Some products also provide protection from negative market movements, preventing your income from decreasing. 

In an account-based lifetime pension your account balance fluctuates in line with your withdrawals and returns from your chosen investments.

Estate planning

The product may continue to pay income to your spouse after your death and you may be able to choose an option that would pay a lump sum to an alternative beneficiary.

In the past, many people were reluctant to choose lifetime products because if they died before they had received the entire amount they invested back through income payments there was often no further benefit payable. Most modern products do not present this problem. The provider often guarantees that you will receive at least your initial investment amount through the combination of income paid during your life and death benefits after you pass away.

However, if the product complies with the capital access schedule for favourable Centrelink means testing, the maximum lump sum death benefit is 100% of the purchase price until you’re halfway between the purchase date and your life expectancy. Afterwards, the maximum declines steadily from 50% of the purchase price to zero when you reach your life expectancy. These limits mean it is possible you will not receive the full value of your initial investment.

Flexibility and complexity

These products are less flexible and more complex than non-lifetime account-based pensions. The level of income is set by the provider and usually increases only with the agreed method of indexation. Alternatively, you may be able to choose from a range of income options within minimum and maximum limits.

The option to make a partial withdrawal of a lump sum and continue receiving a smaller lifetime income afterwards is only rarely available but it is usually possible to close the product entirely and withdraw its remaining value until you reach your life expectancy.
It is usually not possible to transfer any remaining value or balance to another product after you have invested.

Product features vary widely, and more new products will continue to be developed. Understanding all the features and costs of the available options can be difficult.

A popular strategy is to combine an account-based pension with a lifetime pension, to get the best of both worlds. TelstraSuper provides a calculator that can model how one such combination could work for you.

Case study: Mixing an account-based pension and a lifetime pension

Patricia (67) is single, and has just retired. She has no debt, a super balance of $500,000 and owns her home. Patricia wants to generate a regular income from her super, maximise her Age Pension and ensure her savings last so she is not forced to live exclusively on the Age Pension in her old age.

According to TelstraSuper’s lifetime income calculator, if Patricia chooses to invest all her super in an account-based pension with a moderate investment (53% growth and 47% defensive assets) she can expect income of $52,000 a year until she is 93. After age 93, she may need to rely on Age Pension alone (around $30,000 per year in today’s dollars).

Patricia is happy with the income level but is concerned about the risk of her money running out, so she looks at investing $200,000 in a lifetime pension that will provide guaranteed indexed income for life and $300,000 in an account-based pension with a growth investment option. The lifetime pension is entirely a defensive investment with no risk of negative returns, so Patricia is comfortable to choose a more growth-oriented option for her account-based pension.

In this scenario, her desired income of $52,000 is projected to last one year longer, until she is 94. However, the lifetime pension will continue to top up Patricia’s Age Pension after the account-based pension has run out. This results in predicted income of $37,000 per year from age 94 instead of living on the Age Pension alone. Patricia is happier with this option and pleased she can still have a significant account-based pension with the option to withdraw lump sums if required. She is also pleased to see that her Age Pension entitlement is more than $5,000 higher in the first year than it would be if she chose the account-based pension alone, thanks to the favourable means testing of her lifetime pension.

Lump sum

You may withdraw a lump sum from super at retirement of any amount up to your total balance. A lump sum payment can be useful if you need to repay debts, or you have some large expenses such as making home renovations or purchasing a vehicle. Lump sum withdrawals from taxed funds are tax free for people aged 60 or more.

Supercharge your retirement

SuperGuide newsletter

Get super and retirement planning tips and strategies with our free monthly newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

First name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Read more about how tax applies to withdrawals when you’re under 60 and over 60.

Why take a lump sum?

Apart from debts and expenses, there are some strategic reasons a person may take a lump sum from super.

Learn more about the recontribution strategy.

Downsides of taking a lump sum to invest outside super

If you invest money you have withdrawn outside the super system, any returns on your investment will be taxed as normal income at your marginal rate, not at concessional super rates (a maximum rate of 15% in an accumulation account and tax free in a retirement income stream). For many people, this means more tax on earnings, and therefore less money credited to your investment, if money is invested outside super.

Accumulation phase vs Retirement phase

In the super system, there are two phases. The accumulation phase, where your savings accumulate while you are working, and retirement phase, where a pension has commenced and a regular income is being paid.

If you don’t want to use all your super to start a pension or take a lump sum, money can be retained in the accumulation phase throughout retirement. Earnings on any amount retained in accumulation will continue to be taxed at the concessional rate of up to 15%.

Why retain money in accumulation?

  • If your total super balance exceeds the transfer balance cap (currently $2 million), it is not possible to transfer the amount above the cap to a pension. Leaving the excess in the accumulation phase means its earnings are taxed at a maximum of 15% instead of being exposed to income tax rates outside super which could be higher, particularly if you are still working or have income from other investments.
  • For people under the Age Pension age, funds in accumulation accounts are not assessed in Centrelink means tests. Retaining money in the accumulation phase can improve Centrelink entitlements such as the Age Pension of your spouse if they are older than you, or your own entitlement to a payment like Disability Support Pension. When you reach Age Pension age, funds in the accumulation phase are assessed in means testing.
  • Annual payments must usually be drawn from super that has been transferred into the retirement (pension) phase. If you don’t want to be forced to withdraw income, and thereby remove money from the tax-advantaged super system, you may choose to retain money in an accumulation account. Note that anyone up to the age of 75 is now able to make super contributions, so while you’re under 75 any income withdrawals from a super pension you do not spend can be contributed back into an accumulation account if you wish – subject to contribution caps. There is also the option to invest in a deferred annuity if you would like to invest in an income product that does not require withdrawals to start immediately.

Learn more about deciding whether to start a pension or retain money in accumulation when you have significant savings.

Combining options

For many people, the most desirable retirement outcome is a mix of options.

Perhaps you need a small lump sum to clear the mortgage and want to convert the rest of your account to a pension to provide retirement income.

If you’re lucky enough to have accumulated more than the transfer balance cap, you might transfer the maximum to a pension, leave some in an accumulation account and cash a lump sum to take that once in a lifetime holiday.

Maybe your spouse is still working, and you don’t need income from your super yet. You might keep a small balance in accumulation, transfer the rest to a pension account for the tax-free earnings and reinvest your compulsory income payments back into your accumulation account as super contributions where they can continue to grow.

The bottom line

You should now have a good grounding in the possibilities for your super post-retirement. Income stream products (particularly lifetime options) can be complex, so make sure you carefully read the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and ask all your questions before investing. To make the most of your retirement savings, a professional financial adviser can assess your overall situation and recommend the most suitable strategies for you.

Common questions about converting super into retirement income

Accessing your super can be confusing, so we’ve addressed some common questions.

Many of these questions come from our quarterly member Q&A webinars.

Q: My wife and I are both 71 and we’ve delayed starting a pension in our self-managed super fund to try and make our super last longer. But we now need to start a pension as the cost of living is just crazy now. We wish to start a pension. Do we have to wait until July 2024 or can we start one now? How do we tell the minimum? Is it still based on our 30 June 2023 balance?

A: As you and your wife are over 65, you can start your pension whenever you like. You don’t need to start a pension on 1 July of the year. You can start it when it best suits you. That could be today. You could decide, “Hey, let’s start our pensions today”.

What we would do is we would go to our trust deed, if it’s an SMSF or we’d go to our super fund and ask what their processes are that are required in order for a pension to start. Once you’ve done all those things necessary, such as the pension application document, the trustee minutes, once you’ve done everything which is required and it’s signed off, that could be the start date. Let’s say it could be today.

It’s your age on the date that the pension starts to determine what your minimum percentage is, and then you pro-rata that payment based on the number of days left in the financial year. All very wordy, probably better off if we go through an example. Chris has sent an application to start a pension on 1 January 2024. The SMSF trustees agreed to start paying it on 1 January 2024. That’s therefore the start date of Chris’s pension.

We get his pension balance on that date, and I’ve just said it’s a $1,000,000. The minimum pension percentage, which is required for a 71-year-old, is 5%. So, Chris’s minimum pension is $50,000. But it’s starting on 1 January 2024, so we need to pro-rata it based on days. Now, if we do a calculation of 1 January to 30th of June, it’s about 181 days. 181 divided by 365 is 49.5%. Therefore, the minimum pension that Chris has to take is the 49.5% of the $50,000 being $24,750. Now I always round up here to be safe just to make sure that I do meet the minimum. Please don’t use my calculations here. It could be different in leap years. It could be different on start days, but it’s pretty easy to work out how many days are left in the year. That is what we’re doing. We’re pro-rating that minimum pension payment.

So, you can start a pension on any day of the year that you like. Follow the process required by your fund, and then do your calculations. Importantly, then make sure you meet those minimum pension payments.

Some pretty good resources available on our website such as How to start a pensionthe checklist, and our Starting account-based pension webinar. All of those resources are available for you on the website.

Q: Should you put all your super into an account based pension or invest some in a fixed term deposit? What are the pros and cons? If you put some super into a fixed term deposit and then roll it over at the end of the term, will you then start paying tax on returns?

Of course, we can’t provide any personal recommendations here. What I’ll do is I’ll take you through the general issues to consider rather than specifics. It’s a difficult question to comment on because there is probably no single correct or single appropriate response. I hate saying it, but often it will depend. I’ll just start by saying this is something that will be different for all of us. I mean, there’s a whole lot of pros and cons for super, and there’s a whole lot of pros and cons for holding assets outside super.

Now, with the way this question is worded, the way I’m reading it is should we put all our retirement savings into an account-based pension or do we invest some outside of super in a fixed term deposit. That’s the way I’m reading it. Now, the reason I’m clarifying that is remember that with super funds nowadays, you can pretty much invest your super in anything that you can invest your non-super assets in.

Term deposits through super are very common. And in fact, they’re getting even more common now as we’ve seen an increase in interest rates. And that’s being passed on. A lot of these banks also have online fixed accounts that are offering some pretty good rates of return. So, I am starting to see now a bit of money flowing back in to fixed term deposits. That could be within super or it could be outside of super. So really, what we need to look at with your question here, Wendy, is it should it be inside versus outside, which effectively where I think you are going with the question.

Now, when it comes to super, of course, it is probably the most tax efficient investment vehicle we can have. But it’s not the only one. There’s also having investments in our own names as well, and in family trust or in different vehicles. Generally, if we get it right within super, within our transfer balance cap, we have a zero tax rate on earnings. Any amount that we need to leave in accumulation, of course, is a maximum of 15 %. So, it’s a very tax effective vehicle.

But think about those that might not have any other income outside of super. They don’t have shares or property or large fixed interests or cash balances. So therefore, any earnings that they may receive on small amounts outside of super are tax free as well. We need to look at what that person’s marginal tax rate is. So again, what I’m looking at here is, I’m looking here at saying, do we just look at this as the whole super versus non super debate? How much you have already in super versus what you have outside of super. And then therefore, of course, it makes the comments quite simple.

If we leave it inside super in an accumulation account in a fixed term deposit, we’ll pay tax and maximum of 15 %. If I have that money outside of super with no other assets, no other income, I probably won’t pay any tax. So, in that case, the 15 % tax and accumulation will be more than what tax would be outside of super. So, we just need to think about how much we have and how much of our transfer balance cap has been used.

With the question around the tax from the term deposit, if you have that investment outside of super, any income from a term deposit (which is usually on maturity or for longer-term term deposits it might be paid on intervals), that interest would be included in our assessable income and taxed at our marginal rates, usually in the year that we receive that interest income.

So again, if we have no other income, tax rates would be zero. Remember, the first $18,200 of income each year is tax free. That’s a lot of fixed interest income that you could get with a significantly large balance before tax becomes an issue. So, superannuation is a great retirement savings vehicle but not the only one. Sometimes even having it in our own hands, in our own names, can result in a good tax out outcome.

The last comment that I wanted to mention quickly there was, again, this all depends on the underlying investment class. What you can invest in inside super is comparable to what you can invest in outside super. So, the term deposits aren’t just available outside super. Of course, we can get those inside super as well. So, I hope that answers your question as such. And it does come down to those other factors, as I said, your other income assessable income, how much of the transfer balance cap you’ve used, and those sorts of things.

Q: I am about to transfer all our accumulation funds into income funds for retirement income as we are now retiring. Our combined minimum drawdown at 4% will be more than what our living expenses will be, so I am exploring options to put the left over dollars. My options appear to be retaining an accumulation fund to deposit these funds, or simply invest them. What options there are for these additional funds (around $40K per year) and how to then access these additional funds and when?

A: Thanks, Chris for asking the question. Look, I don’t have a magic solution here. It’s an issue that many people face. One of the issues we’ve looked at over the last couple of years (during COVID19 temporary rule changes), we’ve only ever had to take out half the normal pension requirements. Now we’re obviously back to full requirement to draw down pension.

There are a lot of people out there who might be now receiving more money, more income than they have in the past or they need. Now, conversely, I know a lot of people who need more than the minimum as the cost of living has gone through the roof.

But anyway, I’ve got no magic solution for you here, but what I have got are some things you could consider but probably just reiterating what you’ve said. For instance, we could take the pension payments as we’re required by law, the minimum percentage amount out, we could take that and then we could recontribute amounts back in, obviously into the accumulation account where earnings will be including the fund’s taxable income and we pay around 15% tax.

But we could get some tax planning advice there around investing in, for instance, dividend paying shares or frank dividend paying shares, and we could offset maybe some of that tax payable by some of those tax credits. Simply doing what you’re doing, taking the money, recontributing excess back into the fund with some tax planning around it.

Or we could do the same thing but contribute it back into our spouse’s accumulation account. Gives us the same outcomes, but we might then be getting some estate planning outcomes as well.

We could reduce the pension balance essentially by rolling back part of your pension balance back to accumulation, which reduces the minimum pension required to be taken out. But it does give the exact same outcomes as above. We’ve now still got money in the accumulation phase where we’ll be paying tax on those earnings.

Or of course, we could just invest those proceeds outside of the superannuation environment. We could invest them in our own names or in our spouses’ names. Now, don’t forget, with tax offsets and the tax-free threshold, you can get around $21,000 to $22,000 per annum per individual in income tax-free per annum. You could essentially get around $21,000 to $22,000 in income tax-free.

Now, if you invested that and got, for 5% return, that represents what? About the $500,000 capital amount. For a couple, you could be having around a million invested at 5% where you’d be paying very little to any tax.

You need to take that into consideration. You could consider other investment vehicles like trust or companies, or as I said, you could keep it simple, depending on the capital involved. Having around that amount invested with those tax-free thresholds and low income and the rebates and things like that, there’s around, as I said, it’s around $22,000 per annum where you could get tax-free anyway. I don’t have any magic solutions for you there, Chris, unfortunately. They are just some of the things that you could consider doing.

Q: I know that you can easily combine multiple super funds that are in accumulation mode, but can you do it for accounts that are in pension mode? For example, if you have (or planning to have) more than one UniSuper Flexi Pensions, in your name, providing separate pension income streams, can you at some point in time combine them all into one primary Flexi Pension in order to save on account fees? If so, what would be the necessary procedure required to achieve this outcome?

A: Let me take you through the key fundamentals here, and in particular because you’ve referred to a particular product, I’ve just got to be careful with how I reply to you around that. I, of course, can’t give you specific product advice, but I can give you enough factual information for you to then work out what needs to be done.

Number one, you are 100% correct. You can only ever have one accumulation account in each super fund. Now, you could have more than one super fund creating the ability to hold multiple accumulation accounts. An example, I have a self-managed super fund and I also have an industry fund. I hold my insurance benefits through my industry fund because I find it more cost-effective to do that. I’ve got two funds. My SMSF has an accumulation account and my industry fund has an accumulation account. But the restriction I’m looking at here is you can only ever have one accumulation account per fund. You can, again, as you’ve mentioned, have multiple pension accounts or multiple pension interests in the same super fund, which is what you’ve ended up here, and you now want to combine them.

Now, in most all cases, in fact, in almost every case, you can’t add further capital or further amounts to an existing pension. If you’ve got Pension One with $1 million dollars and Pension Two with $1 million dollars, if you put the $1 million from Pension 2 into Pension 1, you’ve added to the value of it. You’ve added to the capital value of that pension, which you’re not allowed to do. What would usually be required is for you to cease those different pension accounts. You would take that money essentially back to accumulation phase, and then you’d start a new larger pension with the combined balances or part thereof of those combined balances.

Now, in your particular case, because it’s UniSuper, they may have their own specific requirements. They may have their own specific processes that need to be used. I would suggest contacting them and seeing how they can assist you personally with that and what mechanisms or processes could be used to achieve the desired outcome you’re looking for around combining those accounts.

What’s interesting is that I jumped on the UniSuper website and it says that once you start a Flexi pension, you can’t add money to it. If you want to transfer extra funds to your super, do that before you apply. That’s word for word from the UniSuper website. Again, to me, it suggests the same process I mentioned before about stopping or commuting the existing pensions, going back to accumulation, and then recommencing a new pension.

Now, let me add, if I can, some further comments here which are relevant to you here around, I suppose, the particular question that you have, but also relevant for all types of funds, including self-managed funds. If you’re considering combining multiple pension accounts, you would need to stop them and take those benefits back to accumulation phase. What the result of that is, is you’ll have one accumulation account. So all the taxable components of all those different pensions get mixed together. All the tax-free components get mixed together. So you then only have that one accumulation account with taxable and tax-free components. Now, it might have been over the years that you’ve put in place estate planning or tax planning to keep those tax components separate for tax planning purposes or estate planning purposes. If you combine the pensions, that could unwind all those years of work, again, because you can only ever have that one accumulation account. When you roll those pensions back, they do get blended.

Second of all, make sure that you pay at least the minimum pro-rated pension before you stop any of them. Then once you recommence the new pension, make sure you pay the minimum on that pension. Otherwise, you’ll miss out on the tax exemption on the earnings. Let’s just say that you have three pensions and today, 14th of December, I decided to stop them. Make sure that the pro-rata payments from 1 July 2023 to today, the 14th of December, you pay each of those pensions before stopping them. Otherwise, the fund won’t get those tax-free earnings because you didn’t pay the minimum pension.

When you then recommenced your new one larger pension today on the 14th of December, make sure that you pay your pro-rate minimum before 30th June next year. Again, just to ensure you get your tax-free earnings.

The final point on this one is that if you cease those existing pensions, whether it be UniSuper, whether it be an SMSF or whatever, and then you start a new pension, think about your estate planning outcomes. Do you now need to put a new reversionary nomination on that pension? Do you now need to put a new death benefit nomination on any of your accounts? Because you have now changed those accounts that exist in the fund. Look, probably not doable unless you do the commutation, the ceasing back to accumulation and then recommencing. But I do highly recommend you contact UniSuper and ask them what their processes are that may be required.

Another member asked a follow-up question.

Q: Thank you for the informative articleMy spouse and I have an SMSF, which started in 2007 and which has multiple pension funds in both names. I do the accounting (that was my area prior to retirement) and have been meaning to combine the pensions to one each, every year but the technicalities are seemingly intricate and fraught with danger as mentioned by a former colleague who wasn’t able to provide the actual technical details.

Apparently grandfathering of the older accounts may mean that one shouldn’t fold these into a new pension account (after converting them all back to accumulation phase of course). Is this to preserve the taxable/non – taxable ratio?

Additionally, how does one meet the TBAR reporting requirements for this event when one would do the actions at a date in the past yet one has to meet the meet the TBAR date requirement date for a quarter which is in the past? When rolling forward to a new year to begin processing one has to have completed the prior year, this is usually well past the quarter in which the reportable event happens.

Please note that our response below is general in nature and doesn’t take into account your personal situation.

Firstly, let us address your question about pre-2015 pensions. These pensions are assessed differently in Centrelink means tests for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card and Age Pension.

If you held a Commonwealth Seniors Health Card immediately prior to 1 January 2015 and have held it continuously since then, any pre-2015 account-based pension is not counted in the income test that determines your eligibility for the card. If you cease a pre-2015 pension, the balance will instead attract deemed interest for the purposes of the income test. This could mean the loss of the card, depending on your overall circumstances.

Similarly, if you were receiving an Age Pension at that time and continuously since that date, income from a pre-2015 account-based pension is calculated based on your actual income payments less a deductible amount for the purposes of Age Pension income testing. If you cease a pre-2015 account-based pension and retain the funds in accumulation or commence a new pension, the balance of the account will instead attract deemed interest that is counted in the income test. This could either improve, reduce, or have no effect on your Age Pension depending on your overall circumstances.

As you mention, when you cease your existing pensions and return these to the accumulation phase, it will result in all of the existing tax components being blended together in your accumulation account, something that can never be unwound. Any prior estate planning or tax planning strategies that you have implemented by keeping your taxable and tax-free components separate would be undone and could never be reinstated moving forward (on these existing benefits). 

Depending on your own personal position and the circumstances of your “death benefit beneficiaries”, merging these tax components and losing the ability to deal with them separately, can have a significantly negative tax effect as I am sure you would be aware due to your accounting background. Hence the need to decide, based on your own position, what is best for you: (1) ease of fund administration by running fewer pension accounts; or (2) the tax benefits that may be relevant from keeping the tax components separate.

In relation to the process of commuting pensions, combining balances, and commencing new pensions, this is not a transaction that would be done at a date in the past. A written request is required to commute pensions back to accumulation phase and the commutation takes place after that request. The TBAR report is then made at the end of the quarter that the commutation (or multiple commutations) took place. Any new pension commenced should also be included in the TBAR report. So essentially, the ceasing (commutation) of the existing pensions AND the recommencement of the new pensions would/could be carried out at the same time and then reported within the same TBAR report. 

For the purposes of TBAR reporting, the market value of the pension must be known at the time of the commutation and the time of commencement of a new pension. Note that the ATO requirement around valuations when a pension starts is as follows: “The valuation should be based on objective and supportable data. In some circumstances a reasonable estimate may need to be made”. If you track your existing superannuation pension balances then you would know what the balances are. 

The ATO provides the following guidance about valuing assets for the purpose of inclusion in the TBAR report and other purposes.

Q: I saw SuperGuide’s article about not being able to add to a pension once it’s started. Does this mean that it’s not allowable to commute the pension, add the additional funds, and then restart a “new pension” with the increased amount? Obviously, all on the same day.

A: Background here, once we start a pension within super, we’re not allowed to put any more capital. We can’t add it to that pension by way of contributions or capital. Now, of course, the pension balance can grow with things like interest and dividends and rent. Earnings can increase the value of our pension, but we can’t add more capital to a pension. So, if we’ve got a pension running and we make a contribution, we can’t mix that contribution in with our current pension.

But we’ve got some choices here. We could stop, commute the existing pension. We could roll that back to accumulation phase, which means all the money we had in pension is now mixed with all the money we had in the accumulation phase, and then we could start a new larger pension with all of that money from the accumulation phase. That’s certainly an option. So, you could stop the pension, take it back to accumulation. You’ve now got all the money in accumulation, and then you could start a new pension with it.

But just another thing to keep in mind is we’re not restricted from the amount or number of pensions that we have. So, another way that could be considered is, instead of stopping the existing pension, you could start a second pension, or a third pension, or a fourth, or fifth, and so on, with what’s in your accumulation. So, you’ve got your pension running, you make a contribution. Instead of stopping the pension, we just take the money in the accumulation, and we commence a new second pension, and you run those two pensions side by side, or third pension or fourth pension. I’ve had clients with 10 or more pensions running.

You need to think about obviously fund efficiencies and fund administration costs. If your administrator charges you per pension, maybe think about combining the two. If they don’t, you might think about running those in conjunction side by side. The real key here actually comes down to tax components. I’ll give you an example, let’s just say that I’ve got my pension running today, and it’s a $1 million pension, and it’s made up all of my taxable component. I’ve had some advice and they’ve said, ‘Garth, make a non-concessional of contribution’, call it $330,000, and I make that contribution today.

If I stop my pension, my $1 million dollar pension, and take it back to accumulation, I’m going to mix up, I’m going to blend that $1 million dollar pension money or taxable component with my tax-free component in accumulation, and they’re blended together. I can’t separate them.

Instead, if I started a second pension with the $330,000, that’s always and forever going to be 100% tax free component. It gives an estate planning benefit. But to answer your direct question, yes, you can stop your pension, combine with the accumulation account and then restart a larger pension if you want to, or you could consider, as I mentioned, running multiple pensions.

Q: I have a query regarding superannuation accounts. When I receive payments from an account-based pension, I know I can put some back to my accumulation account. How is the amount put back treated? Is it a non-concessional or a concessional contribution?

A: With this one, it’s really best just to take a step back and look at what the general contribution rules are. The first fundamental rule around personal super contributions, so they are contributions made by the individual, not by an employer, but by a member, an individual, is that all personal contributions that are made to a fund are treated as non-concessional contributions.

So, all member contributions go in and should be treated as non-concessional contributions until the member informs the trustee that they’re claiming a tax deduction for it, or informs the trustee that it is a concessional contribution by lodging the required form that the fund might have, or that the ATO has. So, all personal contributions going in are non-concessional, and then we change them if we need to concessional, if we’re claiming a tax reduction for those concessional contributions.

If the tax deduction is being claimed by the member making contribution, and the member informs the fund that they’re making or claiming their deduction, then it’s treated at that point as a concessional contribution. If not, it’s a non-concessional contribution. Why I just raise that is I assume what you’re looking at here in your question is what we often refer to as a bit of a recontribution strategy.

With the recontribution strategy, money coming out of super that you want to put back in is usually done as a non-concessional contribution. But just to be clear, if eligible, you could claim a tax reduction and therefore, by lodging that form with the fund, it makes it a concessional contribution.

Again, there’s some good information, some resources, some articles around the different types of contributions. So, for the current 2023 financial year, don’t forget, there’s the guides which get released on 1 July for the non-concessional and concessional contributions guide. Have a look at those. It certainly will give you some more information there.

Join SuperGuide and supercharge your retirement

Unlock expert guides and tools that help you boost your retirement savings, plan and prepare for retirement.
  • Interactive tools and calculators give you power to plan
  • Step-by-step guides help you put plans into action
  • Discover best performing super and pension funds
  • Experts detail tips and strategies to boost your nest egg
  • Comprehensive super rules in plain language
  • Newsletters and webinars keep you on top of the current rules

Find out more


About the author

Related topics,

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-25. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

Responses

  1. rob stewart Avatar
    rob stewart

    Patricia (67) is single, and has just retired. She has no debt, a super balance of $500,000 and owns her home. Patricia wants to generate a regular income from her super, maximise her Age Pension and ensure her savings last so she is not forced to live exclusively on the Age Pension in her old age.

    According to TelstraSuper’s lifetime income calculator, if Patricia chooses to invest all her super in an account-based pension with a moderate investment (53% growth and 47% defensive assets) she can expect income of $52,000 a year until she is 93. After age 93, she may need to rely on Age Pension alone (around $30,000 per year in today’s dollars). is about a net return of 9% a year – that is not a conservative or even moderate risk return rate for someone who is retired when preservation of capital is at the forefront of most retirees mind’s when you can probably assume its less than likely the majority of retirees will need an income past their mid 80’s

    1. Kate Crawford Avatar
      Kate Crawford

      Hi Rob, the calculator is not modelling a simple investment return of 9% per year, but rather 1,000 possible sets of future investment returns and inflation over time and the impact this would have on the outcome. The sets are based on real past average returns and standard deviation of the option that is chosen.
      Patricia’s $52,000 income is made up not only of investment returns on her account-based pension but rather a combination of Age Pension plus drawdowns from her account based pension, which include both investment returns and withdrawals of the capital. By age 93, the balance of the account-based pension is modelled to have been completely exhausted by the drawdowns (i.e., the entire initial balance of $500,000 plus all the investment returns has been withdrawn). In the last year for example, her income would be made up of roughly $30,000 Age Pension and $22,000 from her account-based pension. The real dollar figures will be higher due to inflation, and the model is using an 80% certainty. This means that in 20% of cases the account-based pension balance would be exhausted before 93, and in 80% of cases it would last to at least this age (or beyond).
      All calculators use assumptions and none will predict an outcome with 100% accuracy since real results will vary.
      Many retirees will require income beyond their mid-80s. You may find the lifetime estimator calculator shared with our members by Optimium pensions useful.

      1. rob stewart Avatar
        rob stewart

        Hi Kate,

        thanks for the clarification, much appreciated.

Leave a Reply